3 years ago

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes: The ADvISED Prospective Multicenter Study.

Karin Grimm, Simone Vanni, Francesca Giachino, Sibilla Anna Teresa Salvadeo, Bernd A Leidel, Stefano Grifoni, Emanuele E Pivetta, Peiman Nazerian, Enrico Lupia, Alexandre de Matos Soeiro, Christian Mueller, Múcio T Oliveira, Fulvio Morello
Background -Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) are rare and severe cardiovascular emergencies with unspecific symptoms. For AAS, both misdiagnosis and over-testing are key concerns, and standardized diagnostic strategies may help physicians to balance these risks. D-dimer (DD) is highly sensitive for AAS, but is inadequate as a standalone test. Integration of pre-test probability assessment (PPA) with D-dimer (DD) testing is feasible, but the safety and efficiency of such diagnostic strategy are currently unknown. Methods -In a multicenter prospective observational study involving 6 hospitals in 4 countries from 2014 to 2016, consecutive outpatients were eligible if they had ≥1 of the following: chest/abdominal/back pain, syncope, perfusion deficit, and if AAS was in differential diagnosis. The tool for PPA was the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS, 0 to 3), per current guidelines. DD was considered negative (DD-) if <500 ng/ml. Final case adjudication was based on conclusive diagnostic imaging, autopsy, surgery or on 14-day follow-up. The outcomes were the failure rate and efficiency of a diagnostic strategy ruling-out AAS in patients with ADD-RS=0/DD- or ADD-RS≤1/DD-. Results -1850 patients were analyzed. 438 (24%) patients had ADD-RS=0, 1071 (58%) patients had ADD-RS=1, and 341 (18%) had ADD-RS>1. 241 (13%) patients had AAS: 125 had type A aortic dissection, 53 had type B aortic dissection, 35 had intramural aortic hematoma, 18 had aortic rupture, and 10 had penetrating aortic ulcer. A positive DD test result had an overall sensitivity of 96.7% (95% CI 93.6-98.6%) and a specificity of 64% (95% CI 61.6-66.4%) for diagnosis of AAS; 8 patients with AAS had DD-. Within 294 patients with ADD-RS=0/DD-, 1 case of AAS was observed. This yielded a failure rate of 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-1.9%) and efficiency of 15.9% (95% CI 14.3-17.6%) for the ADD-RS=0/DD- strategy. Within 924 patients with ADD-RS≤1/DD-, 3 cases of AAS were observed. This yielded a failure rate of 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-1%) and efficiency of 49.9% (95% CI 47.7-52.2%) for the ADD-RS≤1/DD- strategy. Conclusions -Integration of ADD-RS (both =0 or ≤1) with DD may be considered to standardize diagnostic rule-out of AAS. Clinical Trial Registration -URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02086136.

Publisher URL: http://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029457

DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029457

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.