3 years ago

Paper Spray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Comprehensive Urine Drug Testing in Comparison to Liquid Chromatography-Coupled Techniques after Urine Precipitation or Dried Urine Spot Workup

Paper Spray Ionization Coupled to High Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Comprehensive Urine Drug Testing in Comparison to Liquid Chromatography-Coupled Techniques after Urine Precipitation or Dried Urine Spot Workup
Markus R. Meyer, Hans H. Maurer, Julian A. Michely
Screening procedures using high resolution (HR)-mass spectrometry (MS) are getting more and more important, e.g., for drug testing or adherence monitoring. Approaches usually include time-consuming sample preparation and compound separation by liquid chromatography (LC). The paper spray ionization (PSI) technique coupled to MS might overcome these steps by direct analysis of complex mixtures without extraction and separation. In recent years, this technology proved its potential for quantification and/or qualitative screening in biofluids. However, so far, PSI-MS was only applied to procedures covering a limited number of targets. Therefore, a PSI-HR-MS/MS approach was developed and successfully validated for comprehensive urine screening. The procedure showed high matrix effects for most drugs but still acceptable limits of identification. Applicability was tested by analyses of three proficiency tests for systematic toxicological analysis and of 103 authentic human urine samples. Its screening power was compared to that of published LC-HR-MS/MS procedures after urine precipitation with conjugate cleavage (UglucP) or dried urine spot workup by conjugate cleavage and liquid extraction (DUSglucE). In the authentic samples, 73% of all 777 drug intakes were detectable with the new approach. The LC-HR-MS/MS screening approaches detected more drugs, particularly in samples with low analyte concentrations, with values of 88% after UglucP or 76% after DUSglucE. In conclusion, the new PSI-HR-MS/MS screening approach was suitable for comprehensive urine screening of different drug classes and might be a promising alternative to conventional procedures. However, limitations should be considered such as detection of drugs in low concentrations and risk of false positive or negative results caused by mixed spectra.

Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03398

DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03398

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.