3 years ago

Risk factors of pain in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

David Beckwée, Laurence Leysen, Jo Nijs, Thomas Bilterys, Nele Adriaenssens, Sofie Vermeir, Roselien Pas

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer remains the number 1 lethal malignancy in women. With rising incidence and decreased mortality, the number of breast cancer survivors has increased. Consequently, sequelae, such as pain, are becoming more important.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of pain in breast cancer survivors.

Methods

PubMed and Web of Science were systematically screened for studies encompassing risk factors for the development of pain in breast cancer survivors. Meta-analyses were carried out for risk factors described in more than one article. Moderator analysis was performed in case of high heterogeneity (I 2 > 50%) across studies.

Results

Seventeen studies were found eligible. Meta-analyses were performed for 17 factors. Significant differences for the odds of developing chronic pain were found for BMI (overall OR: 1.34, 95%CI 1.08–1.67, p = 0.008), education (overall OR: 1.23, 95%CI 1.07–1.42, p = 0.005), lymphedema (overall OR: 2.58, 95%CI 1.93–3.46, p < 0.00001), smoking status (overall OR: 0.75, 95%CI 0.62–0.92, p = 0.005), axillary lymph node dissection (overall OR: 1.25, 95%CI 1.04–1.52, p = 0.02), chemotherapy (overall OR: 1.44, 95%CI 1.24–1.68, p < 0.00001), and radiotherapy (overall OR: 1.32, 95%CI 1.17–1.48, p < 0.00001). After performing moderator analyses for age, comorbidities, hormone therapy, and breast surgery, hormone therapy became a significant risk factor as well (overall OR: 1.33, 95%CI 1.15–1.54, p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

BMI > 30, education < 12–13 years, lymphedema, not smoking, axillary lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and radiotherapy were significantly associated with higher odds for the development of chronic pain, with lymphedema being the biggest risk factor. Lack of uniformity across the studies in defining pain, follow-up, measurement tools, and cut-off values for the diagnosis of pain was noted, resulting in greater inter-study variability.

Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00520-017-3824-3

DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3824-3

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.