3 years ago

A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia

Martin Hirsch, Richard J. McManus, Khalid S. Khan, Anusuya Kawsar, Paula R. Williamson, Sue Ziebland, Marian Showell, Chris Gale, James M.N. Duffy, , Louise Pealing
Background An evaluation of outcome reporting is required to develop a core outcome set. Objectives To assess primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in pre-eclampsia trials. Search strategy Five online databases were searched from inception to January 2016 using terms including “preeclampsia” and “randomized controlled trial”. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia published in any language were included. Data collection and analysis Primary outcomes and data on outcome measure reporting were systematically extracted and categorized. Main results Overall, 79 randomized trials including data from 31 615 women were included. Of those, 38 (48%) reported 35 different primary outcomes; 28 were maternal outcomes and seven were fetal/neonatal outcomes. Three randomized trials reported composite outcomes, incorporating between six and nine outcome components. The method of definition or measurement was infrequently or poorly reported. Even when outcomes were consistent across trials, different methods of definition or measurement were frequently described. Conclusions In randomized trials evaluating interventions for pre-eclampsia, critical information related to the primary outcome, including definition and measurement, is regularly omitted. Developing a core outcome set for pre-eclampsia trials would help to inform primary outcome selection and outcome measure reporting.

Publisher URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi

DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12298

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.