18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Recurrence in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
We aimed to determine whether treatment should be stratified according to 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Patients who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT between 2006 and 2014 (n = 138) were stratified into high (≥ 4.85) and low (< 4.85) PET groups. The clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.
The primary tumor SUVmax was positively correlated with preoperative CA19-9 levels (P < 0.001). The high PET group failed to achieve postoperative CA19-9 normalization (P = 0.014). Disease-specific (P < 0.001), recurrence-free (P < 0.001), liver recurrence-free (P < 0.001), and peritoneal recurrence-free (P = 0.020) survivals were significantly shorter in the high PET group. The primary tumor SUVmax was an independent predictive risk factor for liver metastasis (hazard ratio 3.46, 95% confidence interval 1.61–7.87; P = 0.001) and peritoneal recurrence (hazard ratio 3.36, 95% confidence interval 1.18–10.89; P = 0.023).
Surgical resection failed to achieve CA19-9 normalization in the high PET group and distant recurrence was frequent. This suggests the potential for residual cancer at distant sites, even after curative resection. Stronger preoperative systemic chemotherapy is preferred for the high PET group patients.
Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11605-017-3627-3
Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.
Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.