Assessing the Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm in Identifying Bubbles in Dust Emission.
Stellar feedback created by radiation and winds from massive stars plays a significant role in both physical and chemical evolution of molecular clouds. This energy and momentum leaves an identifiable signature ("bubbles") that affect the dynamics and structure of the cloud. Most bubble searches are performed "by-eye", which are usually time-consuming, subjective and difficult to calibrate. Automatic classifications based on machine learning make it possible to perform systematic, quantifiable and repeatable searches for bubbles. We employ a previously developed machine learning algorithm, Brut, and quantitatively evaluate its performance in identifying bubbles using synthetic dust observations. We adopt magneto-hydrodynamics simulations, which model stellar winds launching within turbulent molecular clouds, as an input to generate synthetic images. We use a publicly available three-dimensional dust continuum Monte-Carlo radiative transfer code, hyperion, to generate synthetic images of bubbles in three Spitzer bands (4.5 um, 8 um and 24 um). We designate half of our synthetic bubbles as a training set, which we use to train Brut along with citizen-science data from the Milky Way Project. We then assess Brut's accuracy using the remaining synthetic observations. We find that after retraining Brut's performance increases significantly, and it is able to identify yellow bubbles, which are likely associated with B-type stars. Brut continues to perform well on previously identified high-score bubbles, and over 10% of the Milky Way Project bubbles are reclassified as high-confidence bubbles, which were previously marginal or ambiguous detections in the Milky Way Project data. We also investigate the size of the training set, dust model, evolution stage and background noise on bubble identification.
Publisher URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03480
Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.
Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.