4 years ago

Self-Reported Medication Use Validated Through Record Linkage to National Prescribing Data

Researchers need to be confident about the reliability of epidemiological studies that quantify medication use through self-report. Some evidence suggests that psychiatric medications are systemically under-reported. Modern record linkage enables validation of self-report with national prescribing data as gold standard. Here, we investigated the validity of medication self-report for multiple medication types. Study Design and Setting Participants in the Generation Scotland population-based cohort (N=10,244) recruited 2009-11 self-reported regular usage of several commonly prescribed medication classes. This was matched against Scottish NHS prescriptions data using three- and six-month fixed time windows. Potential predictors of discordant self-report, including general intelligence and psychological distress, were studied via multivariate logistic regression. Results Antidepressants self-report showed very good agreement (κ=0.85, (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.84-0.87)), comparable to antihypertensives (κ=0.90, (0.89-0.91)). Self-report of mood stabilizers showed moderate-poor agreement (κ=0.42 CI 0.33-0.50). Relevant past medical history was the strongest predictor of self-report sensitivity, whereas general intelligence was not predictive. Conclusion In this large population-based study, we found self-report validity varied among medication classes, with no simple relationship between psychiatric medication and under-reporting. History of indicated illness predicted more accurate self-report, for both psychiatric and non-psychiatric medications. Although other patient-level factors influenced self-report for some medications, none predicted greater accuracy across all medications studied.

Publisher URL: www.sciencedirect.com/science

DOI: S0895435617303062

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.