5 years ago

Clubbing in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases

Clubbing is associated with poor prognosis and is variably present in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but is also seen in other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Little is known about the best methodology to assess clubbing in ILDs and, hence, the prevalence and clinical utility and clinical significance of clubbing. We therefore aimed to evaluate the agreement between different clubbing assessment methods in patients with fibrotic ILDs. Additionally, we assessed the prevalence of clubbing in different fibrotic ILDs and related clubbing to disease severity and quality of life. Methods Consecutive outpatients with fibrotic ILDs of two tertiary referral centers were included. Clubbing was assessed with the phalangeal depth ratio, the digital index, the Schamroth sign test, and by the treating physicians and investigator. Results We included 153 patients (100 men), mean age 65 (range 33–88), mean FVC 79% (25–145%), mean TLCOc 50% (16–104%). Different methods for assessment of clubbing had poor correlation, and as a result, clubbing prevalence varied according to the method used, ranging from 7 to 42% in the total group of patients and 7–52% in IPF. The degree of clubbing did not correlate with FVC or TLCOc (p > 0.2) or with quality of life scores, but lower mean TLCOc scores were seen in patients with clubbing than in those without. Conclusion Clubbing was present in 7–42% of our fibrotic ILD cohort and showed no correlation with disease severity. Although considered an important clinical feature, assessment methods for clubbing showed no to poor agreement. Further studies are therefore needed to gain more insight into measuring clubbing reliably and the possible prognostic value and evolution of clubbing.

Publisher URL: www.sciencedirect.com/science

DOI: S0954611117303608

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.