4 years ago

Modelling the dynamic physical protection of soil organic carbon: Insights into carbon predictions and explanation of the priming effect

Modelling the dynamic physical protection of soil organic carbon: Insights into carbon predictions and explanation of the priming effect
Enli Wang, Jeff Baldock, Zhongkui Luo
The role and significance of physically protected soil organic carbon (SOC) in regulating SOC dynamics remains unclear. Here, we developed a simple theoretical model (DP model) considering dynamic physical protection to simulate the dynamics of protected (Cp) and unprotected SOC (Cu), and compared the modelling results with a conventional two-pool (fast vs. slow) model considering chemical recalcitrance. The two models were first constrained using extensive SOC data collected from soils with and without fresh carbon (C) inputs under incubation conditions, and then applied to project SOC dynamics and explore mechanisms underpinning the priming effect (PE). Overall, both models explained more than 99% of the variances in observed SOC dynamics. The DP model predicted that Cp accounted for the majority of total SOC. As decomposition proceeds, the proportion of Cp reached >90% and kept relatively constant. Although the similar performance of the two models in simulating observed total SOC dynamics, their predictions of future SOC dynamics were divergent, challenging the predictions of widely used pool-based models. The DP model also suggested alternative mechanisms underpinning the priming of SOC decomposition by fresh C inputs. The two-pool model suggested that the PE was caused by the stimulated decomposition rates, especially for the slow recalcitrant pool, while the DP model suggested that the PE might be the combined consequence of stimulated Cu decomposition, the liberation of Cp to decomposition and the inhibition of the protection of unprotected SOC. The model-data integration provided a new explanation for the PE, highlighting the importance of liberation of initially physically protected SOC to decomposition by new C inputs. Our model-data integration demonstrated the importance of simulating physical protection processes for reliable SOC predictions, and provided new insights into mechanistic understanding of the priming effect. The role and significance of physically protected soil organic carbon (SOC) in regulating SOC dynamics remains unclear. We constrained a simple model (DP model) to simulate the dynamics of protected (Cp) and unprotected SOC (Cu), and compared the modelling results with a traditional two-pool (fast vs. slow) model. We found that the majority of SOC was physically protected. Simulating the dynamics of physically protected SOC had significant consequences on the prediction of future SOC dynamics and explanation of underlying mechanisms. Focusing on the priming effect (PE), the modelling results suggested alternative mechanisms underpinning the PE. That is, fresh C inputs did not only increase the decomposition rate of unprotected-decomposing SOC, but also liberated protected SOC to decomposition. Overall, the results demonstrated the importance of considering physical protection processes in soil C models, providing new insights into understanding of SOC decomposition processes.

Publisher URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi

DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13793

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.