5 years ago

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Chinese Version of the Trail-Making Test for Screening Cognitive Impairment

Shenghua Kang, Dongsheng Fan, Xuekai Zhang, Jingnian Ni, Bin Qin, Ting Li, Jinzhou Tian, Liping Zhang, Hengge Xie, Yumeng Li, Yongyan Wang, Jing Shi, Mingqing Wei, Fuyun Ma
Background/Objectives The Trail-Making Test (TMT), which is commonly used to measure executive function, consists of two components (TMT-A and TMTB). There is a lack of normative TMT data for Chinese elderly adults. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the TMT in screening for cognitive impairment. Design 2,294 Chinese-speaking adults aged 50 to 85: 1,026 with normal cognition (NC), 462 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 108 with Alzheimer's disease (AD), 113 with vascular mild cognitive impairment (VaMCI), 121 with vascular dementia (VaD), 282 with uncertain types of dementia, and 15 with mixed dementia. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to test the ability of TMT scores to differentiate between NC and cognitive impairment. Results Age, education, and sex were significantly associated with TMT completion time. The TMT-A exhibited sensitivity of 77.8% and specificity of 92.0% with cut-off value of 98.5 seconds for discriminating AD from NC. The TMT-B had sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 91.8% with a cut-off value of 188.5 seconds for discriminating AD from NC. The TMT-A had sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 81.6% for discriminating NC from VaD with a cut-off value of 77.5 seconds, and the TMT-s had sensitivity of 81.6% and specificity of 83.9% with a cut-off value of 147.5 seconds. The TMT had less sensitivity distinguishing MCI from NC. Conclusion The Chinese version of the TMT is reliable for detecting AD or VaD but poor at distinguishing MCI from NC.

Publisher URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi

DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15135

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.