3 years ago

Inter-observer Variability in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System: In-Depth Analysis and Areas for Improvement

Malak Itani, Richard Assaker, Mariam Moshiri, Theodore J. Dubinsky, Manjiri K. Dighe

Publication date: Available online 8 November 2018

Source: Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Author(s): Malak Itani, Richard Assaker, Mariam Moshiri, Theodore J. Dubinsky, Manjiri K. Dighe

Abstract

The American College of Radiology (ACR) introduced a new standardized system for management of thyroid nodules, the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS). The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the inter-observer variability in applying TI-RADS in clinical practice without prior dedicated training. We evaluated a total of 180 nodules constituting all consecutive thyroid aspirations performed in the radiology department between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2014, with exclusion of histologically inadequate samples. Four radiologists, blinded to each other's evaluation and to final pathology results, evaluated all of the nodules based on the TI-RADS lexicon. TI-RADS score and management recommendations were then deduced from the inputted features. Statistical analysis was performed to determine inter-observer agreement among all readers, as well as between each two readers, in all TI-RADS sonographic features and for recommended management per TI-RADS score with multi-user Cohen's κ (Light's κ) and percentage agreement using R. There was fair-to-moderate inter-observer agreement in nodule composition (two-reader κ range: 0.327–0.533) and presence of calcifications (κ range: 0.229–0.527), but poor-to-fair agreement in echogenicity (κ range: 0.141–0.355), shape (κ range: 0.0729–0.513) and margins (κ range: 0.176–0.283). There was fair inter-observer agreement regarding management recommendations (κ range: 0.242–0.359).

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.