3 years ago

Variability in the evalution of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma

Adam M. Vogel, Jingwen Zhang, Patrick D. Mauldin, Regan F. Williams, Eunice Y. Huang, Matthew T. Santore, Kuojen Tsao, Richard A. Falcone, M. Sidney Dassinger, Jeffrey H. Haynes, Martin L. Blakely, Robert T. Russell, Bindi J. Naik-Mathuria, Shawn D. St Peter, David Mooney, Jeffrey S. Upperman, Christian J. Streck



To describe the practice pattern for routine laboratory and imaging assessment of children following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).


Children (age < 16 years) presenting to 14 pediatric trauma centers following BAT over a 1-year period were prospectively identified. Injury, demographic, routine laboratory and imaging utilization data were collected. Descriptive, comparative, and correlation analysis was performed.


2188 children with a median age of 8 (4,12) years were included and the median injury severity score was 5 (1,10). There were significant differences in activation status, injury severity, and mechanism across centers; however, there was no correlation of level of activation, injury severity, or severe mechanism with test utilization. Routine laboratory and imaging utilization for hematocrit, hepatic enzymes, pancreatic enzymes, base deficit urine microscopy, chest and pelvis X-ray, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) varied significantly among centers. Only obtaining a hematocrit had a moderate correlation with CT use. There was no correlation between centers that were high or low frequency laboratory utilizers with CT use.


Wide variability exists in the routine initial laboratory and imaging assessment in children following BAT. This represents an opportunity for quality improvement in pediatric trauma.

Level of evidence

Level II.

Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00383-018-4417-z

DOI: 10.1007/s00383-018-4417-z

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.