3 years ago

Patient’s views of the consent process for groin hernia repair: Use of consent template improves compliance with best practice (Original research)

Saad U. Khan, David J. Bowrey, Robert N. Williams, Jun Yi Soh, Aikaterini Peleki, Nazli Muhibullah, Peter W. Waterland

Publication date: November 2018

Source: Annals of Medicine and Surgery, Volume 35

Author(s): Saad U. Khan, David J. Bowrey, Robert N. Williams, Jun Yi Soh, Aikaterini Peleki, Nazli Muhibullah, Peter W. Waterland

Abstract
Background

Informed consent obtained for day case surgery has been historically incomplete. An assessment of consenting practice for groin hernia was performed relative to existing gold standards and patient's perception of the consent process was evaluated with a questionnaire. The aim of the study was to identify areas of improvement to comply with best practice.

Methods

A retrospective audit of adult patients undergoing groin hernia repair (June–November 2016) at a tertiary care centre was performed. The same cohort of patients was surveyed with a self-administered questionnaire to identify their view on consenting practice.

Results

113 patients were identified who underwent groin hernia repair during the study period. Pre-printed consent templates-stickers (as opposed to hand-written) were used in 53(47%) cases. In 75(66%) cases, there was complete documentation of the risks and benefits of surgery. 81(72%) patients received information about the full benefits of surgery. 27(23%) patients received partial information and 7(6%) patients had no mention of benefit recorded. Postoperative recovery was fully explained to 85(75%) patients. Use of pre-printed templates ensured 100% documentation compared to handwritten consent forms (risks 37%, benefits 47%, and recovery 53%). Preference for the timing of consent was in clinic (64%), day of surgery (25%). 34(56%) felt the choice for the technique and 22(36%) felt the choice for anaesthesia. Satisfaction was non-significantly better in those consented in clinic (87% versus 76% p = 0.74). 49(80%) felt happy with the overall consent process. 57(93%) felt that they received support and advice. 60(98%) responders felt confidence in the National Health Service and 59(97%) would recommend treatment to family and friends.

Conclusions

The use of pre-printed consent and discharge summary templates improve compliance with best practice. Whilst patient preference favours consent in the outpatient clinic, satisfaction levels were high wherever consent was obtained. Patients should have more choice.

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.