3 years ago

Does apico-coronal implant position influence peri-implant marginal bone loss? A 36-months follow-up randomized clinical trial.

Hilario Pellicer-chover, Maria Peñarrocha-diago, Amparo Aloy-prosper, Luigi Canullo, Miguel Peñarrocha-diago, David Peñarrocha-oltra

Publication date: Available online 12 November 2018

Source: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Author(s): Hilario Pellicer-Chover, Maria Peñarrocha-Diago, Amparo Aloy-Prosper, Luigi Canullo, Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago, David Peñarrocha-Oltra

Abstract
Objective

Preserving peri-implant bone and reducing the exposure of rough implant surface might influence long-term outcomes of implant therapy. The aim of this study was to compare peri-implant clinical and radiological parameters after crestal and subcrestal dental implant placement at 36 months of follow-up.

Material and methods

A randomized clinical trial involving partially edentulous patients in need of an implant-supported, partial fixed dental prosthesis or a single crown was carried out. The patient was randomized according to the implant insertion depth: test group (implants placed approximately 2 mm below the bone crest) or control group (implants placed at bone crest level). The patients were evaluated 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after prosthetic loading. Peri-implant marginal bone loss was the primary outcome and the following secondary outcomes were registered: coronal bone changes, plaque index, probing depth, modified bleeding index, retraction and width of the peri-implant mucosa, and peri-implant health condition. Implant survival and success rates after 36 months of follow-up were calculated.

Results

The study comprised 128 patients (83 men and 45 women – mean age 54.4±12.2 years) and a total of 265 implants (133 in the control group and 132 in the test group). There were no statistically significant differences in the peri-implant clinical parameters. After three years of follow-up, 53.4% of the crestal implants and 25.8% of the subcrestal implants presented marginal bone loss, with a mean exposed rough surface of -0.2±0.3 mm and -0.09±0.1 mm, respectively (p=0.001). The overall success rate was 99.6%.

Conclusions

Crestal and subcrestal implants showed similar clinical outcomes three years after prosthetic loading. Significant differences were observed in the radiological parameters, showing subcrestal implants less peri-implant marginal bone loss.

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.