3 years ago

Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Solving the Conundrum Using Multi-Modality Imaging

David Messika-zeitoun, Jae K. Oh, Yan Topilsky, Ian G. Burwash, Hector I. Michelena, Maurice Enriquez Sarano

Publication date: Available online 13 November 2018

Source: Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Author(s): David Messika-Zeitoun, Jae K. Oh, Yan Topilsky, Ian G. Burwash, Hector I. Michelena, Maurice Enriquez Sarano


Up to 1/3 of patients with both reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), harbor a mean pressure gradient (MPG) < 40 mm Hg (peak velocity (PV) < 4 m/sec), suggesting moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and an aortic valve area (AVA) < 1 cm2 suggesting severe AS but raising uncertainties regarding AS severity and appropriate management. In patients with reduced LVEF, increased transvalvular flow and stroke volume ≥ 20% (i.e. contractile reserve) during low-dose dobutamine echocardiography enables distinguishing patients with “true-severe AS” (severe AS with secondary LV dysfunction, PV ≥ 4 m/sec or MPG > 30-40 mm Hg at peak while AVA remains < 1 cm2) from patients with “pseudo-severe AS” (moderate AS with associated LV dysfunction due to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy, AVA at peak ≥ 1 cm2 with a MPG < 30-40 mm Hg). However, interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiography is often challenging, and absence of contractile reserve is observed in 20 to 30% of patients. Measurement of the degree of calcification (AVC) using computed tomography is an accurate and flow-independent method for the assessment of AS severity. A score > 1250 AU in women and > 2000 UA in men strongly suggest severe AS. Combination of dobutamine echocardiography and AVC scoring enables assessment of AS severity with high confidence. The subset of patients with discordant grading and preserved LVEF is heterogenous and encompasses various conditions. A minority harbor a low flow state related to a reduced myocardial performance, an increased arterial afterload or combination of both. A low flow state is an important prognostic factor but does not provide any information regarding AS severity. Similarly to patients with reduced LVEF, assessment of the degree of AVC seems the best method to differentiate patients with pseudo-severe AS from patients with true severe AS. The latter should be referred for an intervention if symptomatic whereas the optimal management of the former subset remains uncertain.

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.