3 years ago

Corrigendum

The following clarifications refer to Ware (2017).

  1. On p. 377, the labels ‘Material Function View’ and ‘Formal Function View’ correspond to what Kosch (2014) calls the ‘criterial’ and ‘non‐criterial’ interpretations of Fichte. Strictly speaking, the difference between these views is not whether conscience plays a criterial role, but whether it plays a criterial role at a first or second‐order level of practical deliberation. I want to capture this distinction by speaking of ‘material’ and ‘formal’ views instead.
  2. On p. 377, in footnote 1, the correct date of Zöller's paper is 2012, as cited in Kosch (2014).
  3. On p. 377, in footnote 1, see Kosch (2014: 2, note 4) for a critical overview of this literature.
  4. On p. 381, see Kosch (2014: 9) for further discussion of the distinction between the first‐ and second‐order questions.

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.