3 years ago

Harmonized Outcome Measures for Use in Atrial Fibrillation Patient Registries and Clinical Practice: Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society Board of Trustees

Hugh Calkins, Richard E. Gliklich, Michelle B. Leavy, Jonathan P. Piccini, Jonathan C. Hsu, Sanghamitra Mohanty, William Lewis, Saman Nazarian, Mintu P. Turakhia

Publication date: Available online 16 November 2018

Source: Heart Rhythm

Author(s): Hugh Calkins, Richard E. Gliklich, Michelle B. Leavy, Jonathan P. Piccini, Jonathan C. Hsu, Sanghamitra Mohanty, William Lewis, Saman Nazarian, Mintu P. Turakhia


Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects an estimated 33 million people worldwide, leading to increased mortality and an increased risk of heart failure and stroke. Many AF patient registries exist, but the ability to link and compare data across registries is hindered by differences in the outcome measures collected by each registry and a lack of harmonization.


The purpose of this project was to develop a minimum set of standardized outcome measures that could be collected in AF patient registries and clinical practice.


AF patient registries were identified through multiple sources and invited to join the workgroup and submit outcome measures. Additional measures were identified through literature searches and reviews of consensus statements. Outcome measures were categorized using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s supported Outcome Measures Framework (OMF). A minimum set of broadly relevant measures was identified. Measure definitions were harmonized through in-person and virtual meetings.


One hundred twelve outcome measures, including those from thirteen registries, were curated according to the OMF and then harmonized into a minimum set of measures in the OMF categories of survival (3 measures), clinical response (3 measures), events of interest (9 measures), patient-reported outcomes (2 measures), and resource utilization (3 measures). The harmonized definitions build on existing consensus statements.


The harmonized measures represent a minimum set of outcomes that are relevant in AF research and clinical practice. Routine and consistent collection of these measures in registries and in other systems would support creation of a research infrastructure to efficiently address new questions and improve patient outcomes.

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.