Inferring patterns of folktale diffusion using genomic data [Anthropology]
![Inferring patterns of folktale diffusion using genomic data [Anthropology]](/image/eyJ1cmkiOiJodHRwOi8vc3RhY2thZGVtaWMuaGVyb2t1YXBwLmNvbS9pbWFnZT9pbWFnZV9pZD0xMTMwMyIsImZvcm1hdCI6IndlYnAiLCJxdWFsaXR5IjoxMDAsIm5vQ2FjaGUiOnRydWV9.webp)
Observable patterns of cultural variation are consistently intertwined with demic movements, cultural diffusion, and adaptation
to different ecological contexts [Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach; Boyd and Richerson (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process]. The quantitative study of gene–culture coevolution has focused in particular on the mechanisms responsible for change in
frequency and attributes of cultural traits, the spread of cultural information through demic and cultural diffusion, and
detecting relationships between genetic and cultural lineages. Here, we make use of worldwide whole-genome sequences [Pagani
et al. (2016) Nature 538:238–242] to assess the impact of processes involving population movement and replacement on cultural diversity, focusing
on the variability observed in folktale traditions (n = 596) [Uther (2004) The Types of International Folktales: A Classification and Bibliography. Based on the System of Antti Aarne and Stith Thompson] in Eurasia. We find that a model of cultural diffusion predicted by isolation-by-distance alone is not sufficient to explain
the observed patterns, especially at small spatial scales (up to
∼4,000 km). We also provide an empirical approach to infer presence and impact of ethnolinguistic barriers preventing the unbiased
transmission of both genetic and cultural information. After correcting for the effect of ethnolinguistic boundaries, we show
that, of the alternative models that we propose, the one entailing cultural diffusion biased by linguistic differences is
the most plausible. Additionally, we identify 15 tales that are more likely to be predominantly transmitted through population
movement and replacement and locate putative focal areas for a set of tales that are spread worldwide.
Publisher URL: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Pnas-RssFeedOfEarlyEditionArticles/~3/XrIR1mF3gsk/1614395114.short
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614395114
Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.
Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.