5 years ago

Quantified Clinical Risk Change as an End Point During Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance

For men with low-stage prostate cancer (PCa) managed with active surveillance (AS), clinical thresholds for intervention have not been definitively established. We aimed to evaluate whether the magnitude of quantitative risk change may serve as a refined end point. We identified 735 men managed with AS at our institution who received a minimum of two biopsies and who were followed for a median of 52 mo. We described the relative changes in the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score from diagnosis to last follow-up and evaluated the proportion of patients experiencing changes in constituent clinical variables. Among patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP), the association between change in CAPRA score and the occurrence of adverse pathology (pT3a or higher and/or primary Gleason pattern ≥4) was assessed using logistic regression models. Among patients ultimately treated with RP (n =196), unit increases in CAPRA score from diagnosis were associated with the occurrence of adverse pathology (odds ratio: 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.25–2.04; p <0.01). On this basis, disease reclassification should be regarded from the vantage of multiple parameters. Patient summary In this study of men with favorable-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance, we evaluated the change in risk status from initial diagnosis to last biopsy using a readily tabulated clinical instrument. Unit change in the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score was associated with increasing risk of adverse pathologic findings at delayed prostatectomy. This framework may be useful to stratify men based on the degree of clinical change from baseline over time.

For men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance, changes in clinical risk over time are nonuniform and may be regarded along a spectrum. Among men ultimately receiving definitive treatment with prostatectomy, the magnitude of clinical risk change from baseline was associated with risk of high-grade and/or high-stage disease. Reclassification should be considered on the basis of multiple clinical variables.

Publisher URL: www.sciencedirect.com/science

DOI: S0302283816301312

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.