Oncologic Outcome of Metastasectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma: Who Is the Best Candidate?
Abstract
Background
Resection of metastatic lesions (metastasectomy) is performed for highly selected patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). This study aimed to identify the clinicopathologic factors associated with oncologic outcome for patients who underwent metastasectomy for mUC.
Methods
This analysis included 37 UC patients who underwent metastasectomy with curative intent at nine Japanese hospitals. The primary end point was cancer-specific survival. The Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test and the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model addressed the relationship between clinical characteristics and survival.
Results
Metastasectomy was performed for pulmonary (n = 23), nodal (n = 7), and other (n = 7) metastases. The median survival time was 35.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 15.5, not reached) from the detection of metastasis and 34.3 months (IQR 13.1, not reached) from metastasectomy. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate after detection of metastasis was 39.7%. In the multivariate analysis, the time from primary surgery to detection of metastasis (time-to-recurrence [TTR]) of 15 months or longer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23; p = 0.0063), no symptoms of recurrence (HR 0.23; p = 0.0126), and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels lower than than 0.5 mg/dl (HR 0.24; p = 0.0052) were significantly associated with better survival.
Conclusions
Long-term survival could be achieved for some patients with mUC who underwent metastasectomy. Lung and lymph nodes were predominant sites for metastasectomy. Symptoms, TTR, and CRP value were identified as associated with survival and should be taken into account when metastasectomy is considered.
Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-017-5970-8
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5970-8
Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.
Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.