Clinical Outcomes in pT4 Tongue Carcinoma are Worse than in pT3 Disease: How Extrinsic Muscle Invasion Should be Considered?
Abstract
Background
The identification of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion in oral cavity cancer remains challenging. Notably, the most recent American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC 2017, 8th edition) staging manual indicates that extrinsic muscle invasion does not lead to the diagnosis of a T4 tumor. Because this approach carries the risk of tumor downstaging, we compared the clinical outcomes of patients with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) staged as pT3 vs. pT4 according to the AJCC 2010, 7th edition criteria.
Methods
We retrospectively examined the records of consecutive patients with pT3 (n = 135) and pT4 (n = 68) tongue SCC who underwent radical surgery. Of the 68 pT4 tongue SCC, 63 (93%) had extrinsic muscle involvement alone. The 5-year locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis (DM), and disease-free survival (DFS) rates served as outcome measures.
Results
Compared with pT3 tongue SCC, pT4 patients presented significantly more frequently with pN2 disease, extranodal extension, poor tumor differentiation, tumor depth >15 and >20 mm, margin status ≤4 mm, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and were more frequently treated with surgery plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Less favorable 5-year outcomes were observed in patients with pT4 than pT3 tumors (LRC 50 vs. 75%, p < 0.001; DM 27 vs. 14%, p = 0.013; DFS 43 vs. 69%, respectively, p < 0.001). We identified pT4 disease (vs. pT3) as an independent adverse prognostic factor for LRC and DFS.
Conclusions
We suggest classifying patients with tongue SCC and extrinsic muscle invasion as having pT4 disease.
Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-017-5906-3
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5906-3
Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.
Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.