Subtype-specific prognostic impact of different immune signatures in node-negative breast cancer
Abstract
Background
The role of different subtypes of immune cells is still a matter of debate.
Methods
We compared the prognostic relevance for metastasis-free survival (MFS) of a B-cell signature (BS), a T-cell signature (TS), and an immune checkpoint signature (CPS) in node-negative breast cancer (BC) using mRNA expression. Microarray-based gene-expression data were analyzed in six previously published cohorts of node-negative breast cancer patients not treated with adjuvant therapy (n = 824). The prognostic relevance of the individual immune markers was assessed using univariate analysis. The amount of independent prognostic information provided by each immune signature was then compared using a likelihood ratio statistic in the whole cohort as well as in different molecular subtypes.
Results
Univariate Cox regression in the whole cohort revealed prognostic significance of CD4 (HR 0.66, CI 0.50–0.87, p = 0.004), CXCL13 (HR 0.86, CI 0.81–0.92, p < 0.001), CD20 (HR 0.76, CI 0.64–0.89, p = 0.001), IgκC (HR 0.81, CI 0.75–0.88, p < 0.001), and CTLA-4 (HR 0.67, CI 0.46–0.97, p = 0.032). Multivariate analyses of the immune signatures showed that both TS (p < 0.001) and BS (p < 0.001) showed a significant prognostic information in the whole cohort. After accounting for clinical-pathological variables, TS (p < 0.001), BS (p < 0.05), and CPS (p < 0.05) had an independent effect for MFS. In subgroup analyses, the prognostic effect of immune cells was most pronounced in HER2+ BC: BS as well as TS showed a strong association with MFS when included first in the model (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Immune signatures provide subtype-specific additional prognostic information over clinical-pathological variables in node-negative breast cancer.
Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10549-017-4327-0
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4327-0
Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.
Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.