5 years ago

International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology in women with postmenopausal bleeding and sonographic endometrial thickness ≥4.5 mm: an agreement and reliability study

Ben Van Calster, Bavo De Cock, Bart De Moor, Angelo Votino, Alessia di Legge, Thierry Van den Bosch, Arnaud Installé, Letizia Zannoni, Ligita Jokubkiene, Lil Valentin, Beryl Benacerraf, Povilas Sladkevicius, Dirk Timmerman
Objectives To estimate intra- and inter-rater agreement and reliability with regard to describing ultrasound images of the endometrium using the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology. Methods Four expert and four non-expert raters assessed video clips of transvaginal ultrasound examinations of the endometrium from 99 women with postmenopausal bleeding and sonographic endometrial thickness ≥4.5 mm and no fluid in the uterine cavity. The following features were rated: endometrial echogenicity (nine categories), endometrial midline (four categories), bright edge (yes, no), endometrial-myometrial junction (four categories), color score (1 to 4), vascular pattern (seven categories), irregularly branching vessels (yes, no), color splashes (yes, no). The color content of the endometrial scan was estimated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) graded from 0 to 100. The clips were assessed twice > 2 months apart. The raters were blinded to their own results and to those of the others. Results Inter-rater differences in the prevalence of most IETA variables were substantial, and some variable categories were rare. Specific agreement was poor for variables with many categories. For binary variables, specific agreement was better for absence than presence of a category. For variables with more than two outcome categories specific agreement was best for undefined endometrial midline (93% and 96% for expert and non-expert raters), regular endometrial-myometrial junction (72% and 70%), and three-layer endometrial pattern (67% and 56%). The most reliable gray scale ultrasound variable was uniform versus non-uniform echogenicity (multirater Kappa, κ, 0.55 and 0.52 for expert and non-expert raters), the least reliable were appearance of the endometrial-myometrial junction (κ 0.25 and 0.16) and the nine-category endometrial echogenicity variable (κ 0.29 and 0.28). The most reliable color Doppler variable was color score (mean weighted κ 0.77 and 0.69). Intra- and inter-rater agreement and reliability were similar for experts and non-experts. Conclusions Agreement and reliability when using IETA terminology was limited. This may have implications when assessing the association between a particular ultrasound feature and a specific histological diagnosis, because lack of reproducibility reduces the relationship of a feature with the outcome. Future studies should investigate if using fewer variable categories or offering practical training could improve agreement and reliability.

Publisher URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi

DOI: 10.1002/uog.18813

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.