3 years ago

Open dialogue between professionals with different opinions builds the best policy

Alvin Roth, Cataldo Doria, Michael Reese, Ignazio Marino
Delmonico and Ascher [1] respond to Rees et al. [2], but also to a confidential letter of intent, a work-in-progress draft for a possible grant application, which is not a public document and was never meant for distribution. We ask how they would respond to their colleagues taking their confidential grant application, making it public by email distribution, and leading an effort to discredit it before it is even written? This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Publisher URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi

DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14484

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.