3 years ago

The argument against House Bill 1938

Adnan Sharif
Bruce and Koch cite ethical problems with presumed consent legislation in relation to House Bill 1938 currently under debate by Texan legislators (1). Citing flawed assumptions by proponents of the change, they argue for further empirical research and assessment of the impact of the presumed consent model in the United States. However, a simple look at the recent ‘real world’ experience from Wales switching to presumed consent is sufficient to demonstrate the futility of such a change. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Publisher URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi

DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14481

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.