4 years ago

Higgs Production at NNLL +NNLO using Rapidity Dependent Jet Vetoes. (arXiv:2003.04323v1 [hep-ph])

Shireen Gangal, Jonathan R. Gaunt, Frank J. Tackmann, Eleni Vryonidou
The rapidity-dependent jet veto observables and provide a tight jet veto at central rapidity, gradually transitioning to a loose veto at forward rapidities. They divide the phase space into exclusive jet bins in a different way to the traditional jet veto observable , and are advantageous to use under harsh pile-up conditions. We obtain predictions for the -jet gluon-fusion (ggF) Higgs cross section using both of these veto observables at NNLL NNLO, and compare these predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL NLO. A significant reduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL NLO to NNLL NNLO, with the NNLL NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty band of the NLL NLO predictions. We also investigate the relative sensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with , and jet vetoes to underlying event and hadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the cross sections with and vetoes have a reduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to that with a veto.

Publisher URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04323

DOI: arXiv:2003.04323v1

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.

+$NNLO, and compare\nthese predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL; window.__REDUX_STATE__ = {"feed":{"scrollPos":0,"openAccess":false,"performRefetch":{}},"history":{"historyChanges":0},"onboarding":{"stepsList":[{"stepId":"type","stepName":"What kind of researcher are you?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Role","stepName":"What role describes you the best?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Org","stepName":"Where do you work or study?","stepDesc":""},{"stepId":"ra","stepName":"Research Areas","stepDesc":"Select the research areas you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"topics","stepName":"Topics","stepDesc":"Select the topics you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"publications","stepName":"Publications","stepDesc":"We have selected some popular publications for you to follow","options":[]},{"stepId":"feeds","stepName":"Feeds","stepDesc":"We have created this feed based on your interests, you can edit and add more from the side menu","options":[]}],"step":1,"loading":false,"loadingText":"Loading...","selections":[{"name":"type","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"role","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"work_study","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":false},{"name":"ra","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"topics","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"publications","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false},{"name":"feeds","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false}],"topicsNextCursor":null,"topicsFetchingNext":false},"feedManager":{"isManageFeedsFlow":false,"manageFeedType":0,"createEditStep":0,"isSubmitBtnDisable":true,"isPrimaryBtnDisable":true,"activeFeed":{"id":null,"name":"","isOnlyOpenAccess":false,"isOnlyFollowedPublications":false,"inclusions":[],"exclusions":{"keywordsTopics":[],"subjects":[],"publications":[],"articleTypes":[],"authors":[]}},"feedsListCursor":0,"filters":[],"articleTypes":[],"subjects":[],"journals":[]},"common":{"researchAreasAndSubjects":null,"userFilters":[]}};
4 years ago

Higgs Production at NNLL +NNLO using Rapidity Dependent Jet Vetoes. (arXiv:2003.04323v1 [hep-ph])

Shireen Gangal, Jonathan R. Gaunt, Frank J. Tackmann, Eleni Vryonidou
The rapidity-dependent jet veto observables and provide a tight jet veto at central rapidity, gradually transitioning to a loose veto at forward rapidities. They divide the phase space into exclusive jet bins in a different way to the traditional jet veto observable , and are advantageous to use under harsh pile-up conditions. We obtain predictions for the -jet gluon-fusion (ggF) Higgs cross section using both of these veto observables at NNLL NNLO, and compare these predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL NLO. A significant reduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL NLO to NNLL NNLO, with the NNLL NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty band of the NLL NLO predictions. We also investigate the relative sensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with , and jet vetoes to underlying event and hadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the cross sections with and vetoes have a reduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to that with a veto.

Publisher URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04323

DOI: arXiv:2003.04323v1

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.

+$NLO. A significant\nreduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL; window.__REDUX_STATE__ = {"feed":{"scrollPos":0,"openAccess":false,"performRefetch":{}},"history":{"historyChanges":0},"onboarding":{"stepsList":[{"stepId":"type","stepName":"What kind of researcher are you?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Role","stepName":"What role describes you the best?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Org","stepName":"Where do you work or study?","stepDesc":""},{"stepId":"ra","stepName":"Research Areas","stepDesc":"Select the research areas you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"topics","stepName":"Topics","stepDesc":"Select the topics you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"publications","stepName":"Publications","stepDesc":"We have selected some popular publications for you to follow","options":[]},{"stepId":"feeds","stepName":"Feeds","stepDesc":"We have created this feed based on your interests, you can edit and add more from the side menu","options":[]}],"step":1,"loading":false,"loadingText":"Loading...","selections":[{"name":"type","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"role","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"work_study","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":false},{"name":"ra","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"topics","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"publications","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false},{"name":"feeds","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false}],"topicsNextCursor":null,"topicsFetchingNext":false},"feedManager":{"isManageFeedsFlow":false,"manageFeedType":0,"createEditStep":0,"isSubmitBtnDisable":true,"isPrimaryBtnDisable":true,"activeFeed":{"id":null,"name":"","isOnlyOpenAccess":false,"isOnlyFollowedPublications":false,"inclusions":[],"exclusions":{"keywordsTopics":[],"subjects":[],"publications":[],"articleTypes":[],"authors":[]}},"feedsListCursor":0,"filters":[],"articleTypes":[],"subjects":[],"journals":[]},"common":{"researchAreasAndSubjects":null,"userFilters":[]}};
4 years ago

Higgs Production at NNLL +NNLO using Rapidity Dependent Jet Vetoes. (arXiv:2003.04323v1 [hep-ph])

Shireen Gangal, Jonathan R. Gaunt, Frank J. Tackmann, Eleni Vryonidou
The rapidity-dependent jet veto observables and provide a tight jet veto at central rapidity, gradually transitioning to a loose veto at forward rapidities. They divide the phase space into exclusive jet bins in a different way to the traditional jet veto observable , and are advantageous to use under harsh pile-up conditions. We obtain predictions for the -jet gluon-fusion (ggF) Higgs cross section using both of these veto observables at NNLL NNLO, and compare these predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL NLO. A significant reduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL NLO to NNLL NNLO, with the NNLL NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty band of the NLL NLO predictions. We also investigate the relative sensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with , and jet vetoes to underlying event and hadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the cross sections with and vetoes have a reduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to that with a veto.

Publisher URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04323

DOI: arXiv:2003.04323v1

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.

+$NLO to\nNNLL; window.__REDUX_STATE__ = {"feed":{"scrollPos":0,"openAccess":false,"performRefetch":{}},"history":{"historyChanges":0},"onboarding":{"stepsList":[{"stepId":"type","stepName":"What kind of researcher are you?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Role","stepName":"What role describes you the best?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Org","stepName":"Where do you work or study?","stepDesc":""},{"stepId":"ra","stepName":"Research Areas","stepDesc":"Select the research areas you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"topics","stepName":"Topics","stepDesc":"Select the topics you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"publications","stepName":"Publications","stepDesc":"We have selected some popular publications for you to follow","options":[]},{"stepId":"feeds","stepName":"Feeds","stepDesc":"We have created this feed based on your interests, you can edit and add more from the side menu","options":[]}],"step":1,"loading":false,"loadingText":"Loading...","selections":[{"name":"type","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"role","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"work_study","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":false},{"name":"ra","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"topics","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"publications","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false},{"name":"feeds","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false}],"topicsNextCursor":null,"topicsFetchingNext":false},"feedManager":{"isManageFeedsFlow":false,"manageFeedType":0,"createEditStep":0,"isSubmitBtnDisable":true,"isPrimaryBtnDisable":true,"activeFeed":{"id":null,"name":"","isOnlyOpenAccess":false,"isOnlyFollowedPublications":false,"inclusions":[],"exclusions":{"keywordsTopics":[],"subjects":[],"publications":[],"articleTypes":[],"authors":[]}},"feedsListCursor":0,"filters":[],"articleTypes":[],"subjects":[],"journals":[]},"common":{"researchAreasAndSubjects":null,"userFilters":[]}};
4 years ago

Higgs Production at NNLL +NNLO using Rapidity Dependent Jet Vetoes. (arXiv:2003.04323v1 [hep-ph])

Shireen Gangal, Jonathan R. Gaunt, Frank J. Tackmann, Eleni Vryonidou
The rapidity-dependent jet veto observables and provide a tight jet veto at central rapidity, gradually transitioning to a loose veto at forward rapidities. They divide the phase space into exclusive jet bins in a different way to the traditional jet veto observable , and are advantageous to use under harsh pile-up conditions. We obtain predictions for the -jet gluon-fusion (ggF) Higgs cross section using both of these veto observables at NNLL NNLO, and compare these predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL NLO. A significant reduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL NLO to NNLL NNLO, with the NNLL NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty band of the NLL NLO predictions. We also investigate the relative sensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with , and jet vetoes to underlying event and hadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the cross sections with and vetoes have a reduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to that with a veto.

Publisher URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04323

DOI: arXiv:2003.04323v1

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.

+$NNLO, with the NNLL; window.__REDUX_STATE__ = {"feed":{"scrollPos":0,"openAccess":false,"performRefetch":{}},"history":{"historyChanges":0},"onboarding":{"stepsList":[{"stepId":"type","stepName":"What kind of researcher are you?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Role","stepName":"What role describes you the best?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Org","stepName":"Where do you work or study?","stepDesc":""},{"stepId":"ra","stepName":"Research Areas","stepDesc":"Select the research areas you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"topics","stepName":"Topics","stepDesc":"Select the topics you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"publications","stepName":"Publications","stepDesc":"We have selected some popular publications for you to follow","options":[]},{"stepId":"feeds","stepName":"Feeds","stepDesc":"We have created this feed based on your interests, you can edit and add more from the side menu","options":[]}],"step":1,"loading":false,"loadingText":"Loading...","selections":[{"name":"type","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"role","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"work_study","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":false},{"name":"ra","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"topics","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"publications","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false},{"name":"feeds","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false}],"topicsNextCursor":null,"topicsFetchingNext":false},"feedManager":{"isManageFeedsFlow":false,"manageFeedType":0,"createEditStep":0,"isSubmitBtnDisable":true,"isPrimaryBtnDisable":true,"activeFeed":{"id":null,"name":"","isOnlyOpenAccess":false,"isOnlyFollowedPublications":false,"inclusions":[],"exclusions":{"keywordsTopics":[],"subjects":[],"publications":[],"articleTypes":[],"authors":[]}},"feedsListCursor":0,"filters":[],"articleTypes":[],"subjects":[],"journals":[]},"common":{"researchAreasAndSubjects":null,"userFilters":[]}};
4 years ago

Higgs Production at NNLL +NNLO using Rapidity Dependent Jet Vetoes. (arXiv:2003.04323v1 [hep-ph])

Shireen Gangal, Jonathan R. Gaunt, Frank J. Tackmann, Eleni Vryonidou
The rapidity-dependent jet veto observables and provide a tight jet veto at central rapidity, gradually transitioning to a loose veto at forward rapidities. They divide the phase space into exclusive jet bins in a different way to the traditional jet veto observable , and are advantageous to use under harsh pile-up conditions. We obtain predictions for the -jet gluon-fusion (ggF) Higgs cross section using both of these veto observables at NNLL NNLO, and compare these predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL NLO. A significant reduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL NLO to NNLL NNLO, with the NNLL NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty band of the NLL NLO predictions. We also investigate the relative sensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with , and jet vetoes to underlying event and hadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the cross sections with and vetoes have a reduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to that with a veto.

Publisher URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04323

DOI: arXiv:2003.04323v1

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.

+$NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty\nband of the NLL; window.__REDUX_STATE__ = {"feed":{"scrollPos":0,"openAccess":false,"performRefetch":{}},"history":{"historyChanges":0},"onboarding":{"stepsList":[{"stepId":"type","stepName":"What kind of researcher are you?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Role","stepName":"What role describes you the best?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Org","stepName":"Where do you work or study?","stepDesc":""},{"stepId":"ra","stepName":"Research Areas","stepDesc":"Select the research areas you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"topics","stepName":"Topics","stepDesc":"Select the topics you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"publications","stepName":"Publications","stepDesc":"We have selected some popular publications for you to follow","options":[]},{"stepId":"feeds","stepName":"Feeds","stepDesc":"We have created this feed based on your interests, you can edit and add more from the side menu","options":[]}],"step":1,"loading":false,"loadingText":"Loading...","selections":[{"name":"type","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"role","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"work_study","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":false},{"name":"ra","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"topics","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"publications","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false},{"name":"feeds","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false}],"topicsNextCursor":null,"topicsFetchingNext":false},"feedManager":{"isManageFeedsFlow":false,"manageFeedType":0,"createEditStep":0,"isSubmitBtnDisable":true,"isPrimaryBtnDisable":true,"activeFeed":{"id":null,"name":"","isOnlyOpenAccess":false,"isOnlyFollowedPublications":false,"inclusions":[],"exclusions":{"keywordsTopics":[],"subjects":[],"publications":[],"articleTypes":[],"authors":[]}},"feedsListCursor":0,"filters":[],"articleTypes":[],"subjects":[],"journals":[]},"common":{"researchAreasAndSubjects":null,"userFilters":[]}};
4 years ago

Higgs Production at NNLL +NNLO using Rapidity Dependent Jet Vetoes. (arXiv:2003.04323v1 [hep-ph])

Shireen Gangal, Jonathan R. Gaunt, Frank J. Tackmann, Eleni Vryonidou
The rapidity-dependent jet veto observables and provide a tight jet veto at central rapidity, gradually transitioning to a loose veto at forward rapidities. They divide the phase space into exclusive jet bins in a different way to the traditional jet veto observable , and are advantageous to use under harsh pile-up conditions. We obtain predictions for the -jet gluon-fusion (ggF) Higgs cross section using both of these veto observables at NNLL NNLO, and compare these predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL NLO. A significant reduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL NLO to NNLL NNLO, with the NNLL NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty band of the NLL NLO predictions. We also investigate the relative sensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with , and jet vetoes to underlying event and hadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the cross sections with and vetoes have a reduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to that with a veto.

Publisher URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04323

DOI: arXiv:2003.04323v1

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.

+$NLO predictions. We also investigate the relative\nsensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with $\\mathcal{T}_{Bj}$,\n$\\mathcal{T}_{Cj}$ and $p_{Tj}$ jet vetoes to underlying event and\nhadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the\ncross sections with $\\mathcal{T}_{Bj}$ and $\\mathcal{T}_{Cj}$ vetoes have a\nreduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to\nthat with a $p_{Tj}$ veto.","htmlAbstract":"The rapidity-dependent jet veto observables \n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n and\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n provide a tight jet veto at central rapidity, gradually\ntransitioning to a loose veto at forward rapidities. They divide the phase\nspace into exclusive jet bins in a different way to the traditional jet veto\nobservable \n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n, and are advantageous to use under harsh pile-up\nconditions. We obtain predictions for the \n\n \n\n-jet gluon-fusion (ggF) Higgs\ncross section using both of these veto observables at NNLL\n\n \n \n\nNNLO, and compare\nthese predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL\n\n \n \n\nNLO. A significant\nreduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL\n\n \n \n\nNLO to\nNNLL\n\n \n \n\nNNLO, with the NNLL\n\n \n \n\nNNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty\nband of the NLL\n\n \n \n\nNLO predictions. We also investigate the relative\nsensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with \n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n,\n\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n and \n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n jet vetoes to underlying event and\nhadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the\ncross sections with \n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n and \n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n vetoes have a\nreduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to\nthat with a \n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n veto.","createdDate":"2020-03-11T01:30:50.000Z","media":null,"settings":null,"pdfUrl":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.04323","openAccessUrl":null,"authors":{"type":"json","json":["Shireen Gangal","Jonathan R. Gaunt","Frank J. Tackmann","Eleni Vryonidou"]},"contentType":null,"actionButton":null,"journal":{"type":"id","generated":false,"id":"Journal:1220","typename":"Journal"},"headlineImage":null,"__typename":"V4Paper","doi":"arXiv:2003.04323v1","paperUrl":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04323?utm_source=researcher_app&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=RESR_MRKT_Researcher_inbound","metrics":{"type":"id","generated":true,"id":"$V4Paper:4602454.metrics","typename":"Metrics"}},"Journal:1220":{"id":"1220","name":"arXiv High Energy Physics - Phenomenology","cover":{"type":"id","generated":true,"id":"$Journal:1220.cover","typename":"Image"},"__typename":"Journal"},"$Journal:1220.cover":{"baseURL":"https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/stackademic/assets/journal_cover_arxviv.png","__typename":"Image"},"$V4Paper:4602454.metrics":{"selectedCount":null,"viewedCount":5,"bookmarkedCount":null,"__typename":"Metrics"}}; window.__REDUX_STATE__ = {"feed":{"scrollPos":0,"openAccess":false,"performRefetch":{}},"history":{"historyChanges":0},"onboarding":{"stepsList":[{"stepId":"type","stepName":"What kind of researcher are you?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Role","stepName":"What role describes you the best?","stepDesc":"","options":[]},{"stepId":"Org","stepName":"Where do you work or study?","stepDesc":""},{"stepId":"ra","stepName":"Research Areas","stepDesc":"Select the research areas you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"topics","stepName":"Topics","stepDesc":"Select the topics you are interested in","options":[]},{"stepId":"publications","stepName":"Publications","stepDesc":"We have selected some popular publications for you to follow","options":[]},{"stepId":"feeds","stepName":"Feeds","stepDesc":"We have created this feed based on your interests, you can edit and add more from the side menu","options":[]}],"step":1,"loading":false,"loadingText":"Loading...","selections":[{"name":"type","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"role","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":true},{"name":"work_study","selection":null,"type":"single","mandatory":false},{"name":"ra","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"topics","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":true},{"name":"publications","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false},{"name":"feeds","selection":[],"type":"multiple","mandatory":false}],"topicsNextCursor":null,"topicsFetchingNext":false},"feedManager":{"isManageFeedsFlow":false,"manageFeedType":0,"createEditStep":0,"isSubmitBtnDisable":true,"isPrimaryBtnDisable":true,"activeFeed":{"id":null,"name":"","isOnlyOpenAccess":false,"isOnlyFollowedPublications":false,"inclusions":[],"exclusions":{"keywordsTopics":[],"subjects":[],"publications":[],"articleTypes":[],"authors":[]}},"feedsListCursor":0,"filters":[],"articleTypes":[],"subjects":[],"journals":[]},"common":{"researchAreasAndSubjects":null,"userFilters":[]}};
4 years ago

Higgs Production at NNLL +NNLO using Rapidity Dependent Jet Vetoes. (arXiv:2003.04323v1 [hep-ph])

Shireen Gangal, Jonathan R. Gaunt, Frank J. Tackmann, Eleni Vryonidou
The rapidity-dependent jet veto observables and provide a tight jet veto at central rapidity, gradually transitioning to a loose veto at forward rapidities. They divide the phase space into exclusive jet bins in a different way to the traditional jet veto observable , and are advantageous to use under harsh pile-up conditions. We obtain predictions for the -jet gluon-fusion (ggF) Higgs cross section using both of these veto observables at NNLL NNLO, and compare these predictions to the prior state-of-the-art of NLL NLO. A significant reduction in perturbative uncertainty is observed going from NLL NLO to NNLL NNLO, with the NNLL NNLO predictions lying inside the uncertainty band of the NLL NLO predictions. We also investigate the relative sensitivities of ggF Higgs cross sections with , and jet vetoes to underlying event and hadronisation effects using an NLO+parton shower calculation. We find that the cross sections with and vetoes have a reduced sensitivity to underlying event and hadronisation effects compared to that with a veto.

Publisher URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04323

DOI: arXiv:2003.04323v1

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.