4 years ago

High screen failure rate in patients with resistant hypertension: Findings from SYMPLICITY HTN-3

The SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial, which randomized subjects to renal denervation (RDN) or sham control, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RDN for the treatment of resistant hypertension. Outcomes were previously reported. This retrospective analysis evaluated reasons for screen failure (SF) for randomization in the trial. Methods SYMPLICITY HTN-3 enrolled subjects with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥160 mmHg on stable and maximal doses of ≥3 antihypertensive medication classes. Blood pressure was measured during screening visit (SV) 1 and SV2 a minimum of 2 weeks later to ensure resistant hypertension and to exclude white-coat hypertension. We analyzed baseline characteristics and reasons for SF at each SV and changes in BP between SVs. Results Among 1,415 patients screened, 880 (62%) did not meet criteria for randomization. Compared with randomized patients, those in the SF cohort were more likely to be older (58.7 vs. 57.4 years, P =.029), current smokers (14.5% vs. 10.7%, P =.041), and prescribed fewer antihypertensive medications (4.7 vs. 5.1, P <.001). The predominant reason for SF at SV2 was office SBP <160 mmHg despite office SBP ≥160 mmHg at SV1. Conclusion Screening patients with resistant hypertension on maximal doses of ≥3 antihypertensive drugs led to a high SF rate. Screen failures were most common at SV1 and were due to failing the office SBP entry criteria. Not meeting ambulatory SBP criteria at SV2 was a secondary reason for SF, often due to white-coat hypertension; thus, 24-hour ambulatory monitoring is important to validate resistant hypertension.

Publisher URL: www.sciencedirect.com/science

DOI: S0002870317301849

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.