3 years ago
Quantification accuracy of neuro-oncology PET data as a function of emission scan duration in PET/MR compared to PET/CT
To evaluate and compare the effect of reduced acquisition time, as a surrogate of injected activity, on the PET quantification accuracy in PET/CT and PET/MR imaging. Methods Twenty min 18F-FDG phantom measurements and 10 min 18F-FET brain scans were acquired in a Biograph-True-Point-True-View PET/CT (n = 8) and a Biograph mMR PET/MR (n = 16). Listmode data were repeatedly split into frames of 1 min to 10 min length and reconstructed using two different reconstruction settings of a 3D-OSEM algorithm: with post-filtering (“OSEM”), and without post-filtering but with resolution recovery (“PSF”). Recovery coefficients (RCmax , RCA50 ) and standard uptake values (SUVmax , SUVA50 ) were evaluated. Results RCmax (phantom) and SUVmax (patients) increased significantly when reducing the frame duration. Significantly lower deviations were observed for RCA50 and SUVA50 , respectively, making them more appropriate to compare PET studies at different number of counts. No statistical significant differences were observed when using post-filtering and reducing the frame time to 4 min (RCA50 , reference 20 min, phantom) and to 3 min (SUVA50 , reference 10 min, patients). Conclusions For hybrid aminoacid brain imaging, frame duration (or injected activity) can potentially be reduced to 30% of the standard used in clinical routine without significant changes on the quantification accuracy of the PET images if adequate reconstruction settings and quantitative measures are used. Frame times below 4 min in the NEMA phantom are not advisable to obtain quantitative and reproducible measures.
Publisher URL: www.sciencedirect.com/science
DOI: S0720048X17303431
You might also like
Never Miss Important Research
Researcher is an app designed by academics, for academics. Create a personalised feed in two minutes.
Choose from over 15,000 academics journals covering ten research areas then let Researcher deliver you papers tailored to your interests each day.
Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.