Glycemic Status and Prognosis of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus
Abstract
Background
The impact of glycemic status on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) prognosis is unclear.
Methods
A total of 623 patients who underwent curative subtotal esophagectomy for ESCC were evaluated. Diabetes was defined as a prior diagnosis of diabetes under treatment or newly diagnosed diabetes based on preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Poor glycemic control was defined as HbA1c ≥ 7.0%, whereas good glycemic control was defined as HbA1c < 7.0%. The impact of glycemic status on long-term survival after esophagectomy was evaluated.
Results
Among the 623 patients, 64 (10.3%) had diabetes including 30 (4.8%) with poor glycemic control. Although diabetes did not influence patient survival, patients with poor glycemic control had worse overall and disease-specific survival compared with those with good glycemic control (P = 0.011 and 0.039, respectively). Comparing poor glycemic control with good glycemic control, the hazard ratios (HRs) for overall and disease-specific mortality were 1.91 (1.15–3.18) and 1.89 (1.02–3.49) in univariate analysis. After multivariate adjustment, poor glycemic control also had increased risk of overall and disease-specific mortality [HR 1.72 (95% CI 1.02–2.88) and 1.65 (95% CI 0.89–3.08), respectively]. Poor glycemic control did not increase the risk of overall or disease-specific mortality in patients with stages 0–II disease but significantly increased this risk in those with stages III–IV disease [HR 2.05 (1.14–3.69) and 1.95 (1.01–3.80), respectively].
Conclusions
Poor glycemic control is an independent risk factor for overall and disease-specific mortality after esophagectomy for advanced-stage ESCC.
Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-017-4036-1
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4036-1
Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.
Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.