Clinical Nutrition
Clinical Nutrition
5 years ago

Comparing the measured basal metabolic rates in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness to the estimated basal metabolic rate calculated from common predictive equations

Accurately predicting the basal metabolic rate (BMR) of patients in a vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) is critical to proper nutritional therapy, but commonly used equations have not been shown to be accurate. Therefore, we compared the BMR measured by indirect calorimetry (IC) to BMR values estimated using common predictive equations in VS and MCS patients. Methods Body composition variables were measured using the bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) technique. BMR was measured by IC in 82 patients (64 men and 18 women) with VS or MCS. Patients were classified by body mass index as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2, n = 34) or normal-weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2, n = 48). BMR was estimated for each group using the Harris–Benedict (H–B), Schofield, or Cunningham equations and compared to the measured BMR using Bland–Altman analyses. Results For the underweight group, there was a significant difference between the measured BMR values and the estimated BMR values calculated using the H–B, Schofield, and Cunningham equations (p < 0.05). For the normal-weight group, the BMR values estimated using the H–B and Cunningham equations were different significantly from the measured BMR (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 respectively). Of the predictive equations, only Schofield was not significantly different from the measured BMR in the normal-weight group. The Schofield equation showed the best concordance (only 41.5%) with the BMR values measured by IC. Conclusions None of the commonly used equations to estimate BMR were suitable for the VS or MCS populations. Indirect calorimetry is the preferred way to avoid either over or underestimate of BMR values.

Publisher URL: www.sciencedirect.com/science

DOI: S0261561416312493

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.