BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
5 years ago

Drospirenone-containing combined oral contraceptives and the risk of arterial thrombosis: a population-based nested case-control study

L Joseph, HA Abenhaim, KB Filion, S Suissa, M Eberg, MJ Eisenberg, N Larivée
Objective To compare the rate of arterial thromboembolism (ATE) of drospirenone-containing COCs to that of levonorgestrel-containing COCs. Design Population-based cohort study. Setting United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), which contains clinical records for >11 million patients. Population Women aged 16–45 years prescribed a drospirenone- or levonorgestrel-containing COC between May 2002 and June 2012. Methods We conducted nested case-control analyses using risk set sampling to randomly select up to 10 controls for each ATE case, matched on age, cohort entry year, CPRD registration year, COC user type (first-time ever, new, switcher, or prevalent users), duration of COC use, duration of progestin-only or implantable contraceptive use, pre-cohort entry duration of drospirenone and levonorgestrel use, and duration of follow up. Main outcome measures We used conditional logistic regression to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for high-dimensional propensity scores. Results Our cohort included 339 743 women followed over a mean 4.4 years, during which 228 ATE cases occurred: 37 myocardial infarctions, 170 strokes, and 21 other ATEs; overall rate: 1.5 events per 10 000 person-years (PYs). After adjusting for potential confounders, the hazard ratio for ATE with current use of drospirenone-containing COCs versus current use of levonorgestrel-containing COCs was 0.89 (95% CI 0.35, 2.28), corresponding to a rate difference of −0.16 events per 10 000 PYs. Conclusions The overall rate of ATE in this population is low regardless of which COC was taken. We found little evidence of a difference in the rate of ATE with drospirenone- versus levonorgestrel-containing COCs. Tweetable abstract Little evidence was found of a greater incidence of arterial thrombosis with drospirenone versus levonorgestrel contraceptives.

Publisher URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi

DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14358

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.