3 years ago

Spectroscopic Characterization, Computational Investigation, and Comparisons of ECX– (E = As, P, and N; X = S and O) Anions

Spectroscopic Characterization, Computational Investigation, and Comparisons of ECX– (E = As, P, and N; X = S and O) Anions
Matthias Driess, Xue-Bin Wang, Christopher C. Cummins, Weston Thatcher Borden, Bo Chen, Hansjörg Grützmacher, Zheng Yang, Wesley J. Transue, Gao-Lei Hou
Three newly synthesized [Na+(221-Kryptofix)] salts containing AsCO, PCO, and PCS anions were successfully electrosprayed into a vacuum, and these three ECX anions were investigated by negative ion photoelectron spectroscopy (NIPES) along with high-resolution photoelectron imaging spectroscopy. For each ECX anion, a well-resolved NIPE spectrum was obtained, in which every major peak is split into a doublet. The splittings are attributed to spin–orbit coupling (SOC) in the ECX radicals. Vibrational progressions in the NIPE spectra of ECX were assigned to the symmetric and the antisymmetric stretching modes in ECX radicals. The electron affinities (EAs) and SO splittings of ECX are determined from the NIPE spectra to be AsCO: EA = 2.414 ± 0.002 eV, SO splitting = 988 cm–1; PCO: EA = 2.670 ± 0.005 eV, SO splitting = 175 cm–1; PCS: EA = 2.850 ± 0.005 eV, SO splitting = 300 cm–1. Calculations using the B3LYP, CASPT2, and CCSD(T) methods all predict linear geometries for both the anions and the neutral radicals. The calculated EAs and SO splittings for ECX are in excellent agreement with the experimentally measured values. The simulated NIPE spectra, which are based on the calculated Franck–Condon factors, and the SO splittings nicely reproduce all of the observed spectral peaks, thus allowing unambiguous spectral assignments. The finding that PCS has the greatest EA of the three triatomic molecules considered here is counterintuitive based upon simple electronegativity considerations, but this finding is understandable in terms of the movement of electron density from phosphorus in the HOMO of PCO to sulfur in the HOMO of PCS. Comparisons of the EAs of PCO and PCS with the previously measured EA values for NCO and NCS are made and discussed.

Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b02984

DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b02984

You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.