Do we need 3D tube current modulation information for accurate organ dosimetry in chest CT? Protocols dose comparisons
Abstract
Objectives
To compare the lung and breast dose associated with three chest protocols: standard, organ-based tube current modulation (OBTCM) and fast-speed scanning; and to estimate the error associated with organ dose when modelling the longitudinal (z-) TCM versus the 3D-TCM in Monte Carlo simulations (MC) for these three protocols.
Method
Five adult and three paediatric cadavers with different BMI were scanned. The CTDIvol of the OBTCM and the fast-speed protocols were matched to the patient-specific CTDIvol of the standard protocol. Lung and breast doses were estimated using MC with both z- and 3D-TCM simulated and compared between protocols.
Results
The fast-speed scanning protocol delivered the highest doses. A slight reduction for breast dose (up to 5.1%) was observed for two of the three female cadavers with the OBTCM in comparison to the standard. For both adult and paediatric, the implementation of the z-TCM data only for organ dose estimation resulted in 10.0% accuracy for the standard and fast-speed protocols, while relative dose differences were up to 15.3% for the OBTCM protocol.
Conclusion
At identical CTDIvol values, the standard protocol delivered the lowest overall doses. Only for the OBTCM protocol is the 3D-TCM needed if an accurate (<10.0%) organ dosimetry is desired.
Key points
• The z-TCM information is sufficient for accurate dosimetry for standard protocols.
• The z-TCM information is sufficient for accurate dosimetry for fast-speed scanning protocols.
• For organ-based TCM schemes, the 3D-TCM information is necessary for accurate dosimetry.
• At identical CTDI vol , the fast-speed scanning protocol delivered the highest doses.
• Lung dose was higher in XCare than standard protocol at identical CTDI vol .
Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-017-4863-3
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4863-3
Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.
Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.